Why I didn’t re-post that “Marriage Isn’t for You” article (and it’s not just because I didn’t like it).

Let’s talk about discernment, says the woman who watched a movie last night that was so bad that it doesn’t even have a score on Rotten Tomatoes.

Let’s talk about discernment, says the woman who stayed home from work sick today and thought she might make her sore throat better by eating ice cream.

OK, so, maybe I am not the best person to start this conversation about discernment. But I’m gonna.

In the past couple of days, I’ve seen a blog post floating around Facebook about marriage. If you’re on Facebook with any regularity, you’ve probably seen it too. My apologies to the author of that post, because although his opinions were pretty bad, I’m not actually annoyed at him. I’m more annoyed and frustrated by the internet’s response to him.

Maybe some people genuinely read his post thoughtfully and really loved it, and thought their Facebook friends would benefit from reading it. Maybe! Probably some of them, at least?

But I have my suspicions. That more likely, people were enticed by its popularity and of-the-momentness, and were seduced by some of the romantic-sounding things it said, and thought that – since so many others had loved it, they probably would also love it.

Now I’m not saying that it was terrible and totally unworthy of attention, but, you guys… it wasn’t great.

(And, are we really so hard-up for marriage advice that we’re taking it from some internet stranger who’s been married for 18 months? But that’s a post for another time.)

Now, I don’t know this blogger, and have no idea what his intentions were when writing this post, and I’m guessing he didn’t expect it to be shared so widely. But, his post and the internet’s response to it frustrated me, because it met all of the requirements of a feel-good yet personally challenging article that people love to like, retweet, and share online. It was a nice little post to read through quickly, feel a little convicted about, re-post, and then move on with your day. It’s no surprise that it was shared and re-shared all over Facebook.

Cheeky title that sounds a bit provocative? Check.

Humble perspective followed by wise-sounding advice (“I’ve only been married a year and a half, BUT…”)? Check.

Challenging but easily-digestable life lesson summed up in a short little post? You betcha.

For better or worse, we live in a time where there’s just tons and tons of stuff coming at us, all the time. And it’s not necessarily bad to take so much in (although I’m sure you could make a very good argument against it), but it seems that the combination of massive amounts of stuff + a mob mentality has impaired our ability to absorb information with discrimination. We absorb so much, that it seems we forget to stop and think about what we actually think about it! We see a popular article floating around, read it indiscriminately, and then, because our friends have recommended it and it sounds nice and inoffensive, we nod our heads and hit retweet, share, like. Just because everyone else is sharing that article doesn’t mean you have to read it, and just because you read it, you don’t have to agree with it.

I know a lot of people in real life, and I know that a lot of them are smart and thoughtful, and yet sometimes, it seems that when we’re confronted with a post, book, or video that someone tells us we simply MUST CONSUME, we start to lose our ability to consume with discrimination. We just consume mindlessly, assuming that if everyone else loved it, we probably should too.

Case in point: the terrible movie I watched last night. But I was like, well Connie Britton is in it, and Connie has never led me astray, so I simply must watch the entire movie even though it sucks! Even now, I think to myself, “maybe it wasn’t that bad?” simply because I don’t want to admit that I totally wasted two hours of my life.

In this age, everyone has a platform (including me!), but that doesn’t make the content any good. Anyone can create a digital platform, but that doesn’t mean they’re saying anything of value. They might be! But maybe not. But we can’t expect every blogger to create and present really, truly good stuff. Instead, it’s our responsibility – as the consumers – to read with discrimination.

Recently, I was talking to my mom about a writer we both love, and I was going on and on about how great she was and how everyone should read her. My mom agreed about how much she liked this writer and how important she was, but then told me to make sure I read with a discriminating mind. That, although she’s proven a trustworthy source, I shouldn’t read her with a mind that just assumes everything she writes is perfect and true and accurate. Sure, I should trust her based on what I know of her, but I shouldn’t think things like “everything you say is perfect!” because that turns me into someone who’s A. unwilling to think for herself B. kind of a stalker weirdo, I guess.

And that conversation really shifted something in me. It made me think more critically about reading and consuming. And it also made it much harder for me to love people on social media, because sometimes… sometimes… it’s just so hard. Sometimes I want to shake people. But I’m trying to not want to shake people so much.

The next time I see some popular article floating around, I might read it. I might even like – or LOVE – it. But first, I’ll try my best to forget all the likes, and the shares, and the retweets, and the glowing recommendations, and the cutesy and convicting title – and just read it for what it is.


2 thoughts on “Why I didn’t re-post that “Marriage Isn’t for You” article (and it’s not just because I didn’t like it).

  1. The title for the article was perfectly ironic. I thought it was an Onion.com article until I saw the link and read it. That’s when I found out that the title wasn’t satirical at all and that it nailed the POV of the article perfectly. The title was an irony paradox. The flip of the article’s title POV was masterful. It was a magic trick and it was linked to an all time great piece of altruistic marriage advice. So, it seems proper to me that people to shared it like they were in the Blackhawks championship parade waving their banners proudly. Sometimes, the bandwagon is a really fun place to be and there is no good reason to not be there. Surely, the parade could have fewer people and still serve it’s purpose, but why? Who gains from fewer people celebrating and sharing, especially a great idea and wonderful trick? No one. If the idea is just shared, the one who shared it joined in the fun too and no one got hurt and possibly people who hadn’t heard that idea heard it and have had their life improved because of it. Perhaps reading it for what it is isn’t what’s important. Perhaps it’s deciding to participate in something that has no negative side effects. Why the heck not?

  2. Jordan – thanks for reading. I think many real headlines are actually Onion headlines at first, too. I picked on that particular article because it was the one that really got me thinking about reading with a discerning eye. It just made me think about my inclination to read things that have been shared (or liked, retweeted, etc) by the masses and to assume they’re worthwhile without actually reading them critically, and I think others do the same thing. And, I don’t think it’s good to just jump on the bandwagon for the sake of jumping on the bandwagon. Don’t get me wrong – I love getting excited about ideas and sharing them – but I don’t think it’s a good idea to do that unless you really believe in what you’re sharing. And if you do, then of course, share away!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s